![]() ![]() What about ads that have falsehoods in them that wind up getting on the air?ĭo you think there should be or shouldn't be some kind of federal regulation on truth? The government stepping in and saying, "This is good speech, this is bad speech" is something that the government has tried to avoid. So is the only filter basically cable channels who are allowed to reject false ads or the candidates themselves? But that's the principal way in which there is a legal First Amendment-respecting route to at least making it clear who's behind whatever the message is. I mean, who is Americans for Puppies and the Flag? And unfortunately, the November 2016 election turned out as it did and that activity died. The Republicans hated this idea - the idea of requiring real disclosure. And it is one of the things that, frankly, we were getting ready to deal with at the FCC, and I had made the decision to wait until after the 2016 election, because I didn't want this to become politicized. It's not a big deal when a commercial for Corn Flakes says it's Kellogg's, you know that, right? The problem is that a political ad that is sponsored by Americans for Puppies and the Flag, you've got no idea who that is. There is a requirement in the FCC rules that an advertiser has to disclose who's advertising, right? Where the federal government can do some things, and hasn't done enough, is on the question of political advertising and attribution of those ads. Wheeler: There's a First Amendment hurdle that has to be crossed, and that has traditionally proven pretty high insofar as making judgments about factual statements. NPR: How does it work as far as regulation of truth and political ads goes for the federal government? Then-Federal Communications Commission Chair Tom Wheeler testifies before a House committee on March 17, 2015. Ads, especially introductory ones, are intended to get attention, and this one appears to have gotten a good bang for the campaign's buck. The spot aired 13 times locally, compared with 20 times on national cable. ![]() The Lake campaign spent only about $5,000 on the ad buy on local broadcast stations in Phoenix, Tucson and Yuma, according to the ad-tracking firm AdImpact. "You know how to know it's fake? Because they won't even cover the biggest story out there: the rigged election of 2020. "If you're watching this ad right now, it means you're in the middle of watching a fake news program," Lake said in the ad. Lake, a Republican former TV anchor who has been endorsed by former President Donald Trump, got lots of attention with an introductory ad in which she invoked the lie that the 2020 election was rigged (and that the news media won't cover the rigging). ![]() Sometimes, those things are even lies, like in an ad from Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake. Political candidates can say some outrageous things. Lake's introductory campaign ad included baseless claims of a rigged 2020 election. Republican candidate for Arizona governor Kari Lake points to the crowd at a rally for former President Donald Trump on Jan. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |